The newest Pearson?s r evaluation were used to analyze the relationship amongst the details of data

The newest Pearson?s r evaluation were used to analyze the relationship amongst the details of data

c) Relatives Versatility and you will Cohesion Analysis Level-20Esp.

Which software are good Language type of Nearest and dearest Versatility and you will Cohesion Comparison Measure II (Face II) , done-by ily doing work. The fresh new Faces-20Esp comes with 20 activities, having a Likert-kind of size with results anywhere between step one (never ever otherwise rarely) so you can 5 (always). What exactly was grouped for the one or two subscales, off 10 items per, and that size two dimensions of family relations functioning: versatility and you may cohesion [step one,3]. As the Circumplex Model takes into account these two size due to the fact curvilinear, that it questionnaire strategies him or her linearly.

So it appliance provides obtained higher inner surface indices (Cronbach’s alpha): .89 within the Cohesion and you may .87 in Versatility. New build authenticity is actually backed by good confirmatory factor study you to definitely indicated the brand new bidimensional framework created by the authors. Of almost every other legitimacy evidences, it actually was learned that which size was congruently from the almost every other tools you to size relevant constructs, like the Household members Environment Measure. In the present data, highest internal surface indices was basically received (Cronbach’s alpha): Cohesion = .92, and you can Flexibility = .91.

d) State-Feature Anxiety Collection.

The state-Feature Nervousness Inventory (STAI), produced by Spielberger et al. , could have been modified to help you Spanish because of the Seisdedos . This survey is composed of one or two scales one to level a couple of some other constructs: Feature Anxiety (T/A) and you may State Anxiety (S/A). Each of the scales is comprised of 20 products that was replied which have an excellent Likert-sort of scale between 0 (nothing) to three (a great deal) on S/A scale, and you may away from 0 (rarely) to 3 (always) into the T/A level. The full rating of each size, which can oscillate ranging from viewpoints from 0 so you’re able to sixty, is gotten with the addition of the prices of the additional items that allow right up, you might say the large score match large levels of anxiety .

The psychometric features for the tool are enough. Regarding the recognition education demonstrated an internal consistency (Cronbach’s leader) between .83 and you can .ninety five. Additionally, it exhibited evidence of concurrent validity by the related brand new STAI level compared to that regarding other surveys that also level nervousness : this new Affect Adjectives Check list (AACL) , the brand new Institute regarding Identification and you will Function Review-Anxiety Size (IPAT-AS) , therefore the Taylor’s Manifest Nervousness Measure . In the current investigation, just the trait anxiety scale was utilized, that an effective Cronbach’s alpha from .91 is obtained.


The information collection was over due to an on-line questionnaire, made in Google Variations and you will delivered by way of some other programs. So it incorporated a demonstration into term of the scientists, the reason for the research, the fresh new commitment out of confidentiality, the fresh guidelines while the gratitude for the involvement. Data out-of individuals who found all of the addition conditions had been entered to the SPSS-21 and you can subjected to relevant statistical evaluation.

Study analysis

A few mathematical data was in fact carried out in order to satisfy the newest expectations of one’s studies. To determine the appropriate analytical take to when you look at the for every single situation, the latest presumptions for every single of the screening were searched. The fresh new Beginner?s t evaluation to possess separate products was in fact carried out to analyze variations out-of means inside differentiation out-of thinking and you will anxiety based on intercourse. Just after checking the brand new relevant assumptions, a straightforward linear regression try performed to check on if family doing work predicts the amount of differentiation, and you can a parallel linear regression are presented to understand more about in the event that friends performing and you will distinction out-of thinking expect anxiety. Along with, a partial relationship investigation is actually carried to check on the outcome regarding the brand new distinction from notice into relationship between your friends functioning and nervousness.

Finally, to check if the differentiation of self mediates the effect of family functioning on trait anxiety, a mediation analysis was performed using a bootstrapping procedure with the macro PROCESS version 3 for SPSS . The parameter estimates were based on 5000 bootstrap samples. The mediational model 4 was used, in which family functioning was considered as an independent variable, differentiation of self as a mediating variable and trait anxiety as a dependent variable. Confidence interval for the indirect effect was analyzed, and it was considered that if the interval did not include zero it would indicate a statistically significant indirect effect with p < .05 .

Leave a Comment